Haaretz Editorial on Dirasat Report: A civics lesson | | Political and Legal Attacks on the Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel | | Arab educators in uproar over plan to study Begin and Ben-Gurion - Haaretz, 18.6.12 | | Netanyahu's housing reform ignores Israeli Arab communities, says new research (Haaretz, 29.3.2012) | | Conference Highlights the Importance of Higher Education for Arab-Palestinians | | Housing in Israel: The Unique Situation of Arab-Palestinian Citizens | | Position Paper: Arab Students and Higher Education - Problems and Challenges (Hebrew) | | Sensitive and small-scale (by Avirama Golan) | | Dirasat Releases a Publication on Arab Education’ | | Policy Statement: Lieberman’s support for ‘Population Exchange’ | | Establishment of an Arab Pedagogic Council | | Old problems, new challenges | | Arabs have no choice but to build illegally | Dirasat Releases a Report on Psychometric Exams | | Study reveals tax collection in Arab cities on the rise 0 | | Dirasat in Focus: Education as a Case Study0 | | Who's afraid of educated Arabs? (Haaretz, 24.7.09): 0
About Dirasat
ÚŃČí
עברית



















Background

DIRASAT’s Overarching Goal

Rationale

Vision Statement

Mission Statement

Goals and Objectives

Strategies and activities

Guiding Principles

Dirasat in Comparative Perspective

List of Board Members

Staff

Establishing group

Recent Activities

Contact Us




Press Releases

Media Reports

Disparities in Socio-Economic Status
Disparities in Education

Disparities in Education (Hebrew)

Educational TV Program on the Arab Minority (Hebrew)
AFTER THE RIFT: New Directions for Government Policy towards the Arab Population in Israel (2000)English | Hebrew
Cancel the Minimum Age Requirements!
- UN Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities

- UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples


Reports of Human Rights Watch
IDENTITY CRISIS: ISRAEL AND ITS ARAB CITIZENS (ICG, 2004)
Back to Basics: Israel’s Arab Minority and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (International Crisis Group, 2012)

-

Rationale

Citizenship is not limited to legal definitions, but is largely defined by experiences. Political science scholars identify two dimensions of citizenship: the 'formal', which represents the legal/institutional recognition of the rights that an individual can exercise as a citizen; and the 'substantive', which denotes the degree of enjoyment of these rights by the actual individual.[1] The state uses sets of laws and public policies to regulate who is entitled to become a citizen (formal citizenship) and who is entitled to the rights and benefits that accompany citizenship (substantive citizenship). The boundaries of inclusion/exclusion are established according to this set of laws and policies at both external and internal levels. Whereas at the external level a state distinguishes between who is a citizen and who is not, it distinguishes at the internal level between persons who benefit fully from rights (first class citizens) and citizens with second class status that do not enjoy full access to their formally granted rights.[2] In the internal arena, these boundaries are often set according to lines of race, ethnicity and gender.[3] Exclusion, as defined by some scholars, refers to “the inability to participate effectively in economic, social, political, and cultural life, and, in some characterizations alienation and distance from the mainstream society”.[4]

 

From a narrow perspective, abandoning discriminatory paradigms in the Israeli context can be viewed as equivalent to dismantling the advantageous position of a certain group of citizens. However, should this viewpoint be widened, one can only conclude that real inclusive democracy cannot flourish while discrimination is upheld in both law and policy. In multi-cultural/ethnic societies, inclusion does not mean abolishing the differentiations between identities within a given society, but rather it means ensuring equal opportunity for all to participate in every sphere of life, while preserving (and even celebrating) the uniqueness of each group. Although the process of reaching optimal inclusiveness might necessitate some painful concessions for the majority, the end results positively impact the whole state as they enable it to enjoy the fruits of realizing its full social and human capital.

 

Arab-Palestinians in Israel are denied the benefits of substantive citizenship. They suffer from dual discrimination: de jure and de facto.[5] The former relates to the formal law that establishes their disadvantaged status in relation to Jewish citizens; while the latter is represented by the enacted policies and modes of implementation that have direct implications on their low socio-economic status and on their exclusion from mainstream society, most significantly including its centers of power and the public sphere. Furthermore, despite comprising one fifth of Israel's population, Arab-Palestinians are denied formal minority status and, therefore, their full collective rights, including those related to the preservation of their own unique culture and its representation in the state's cultural life. Furthermore, the Arab minority is denied due recognition as an indigenous minority, and thus does not enjoy the rights associated with this status.[6]

 

The applied research that DIRASAT carries out is geared towards defining the barriers to substantive citizenship as they are experienced by the Arab-Palestinian citizens as individuals and as a collective. Inherent to this sort of research is the identification of measures that could be used to engender change and abolish these barriers at both the law and policy levels. Hence, DIRASAT presents the resulting position papers to decision-makers within the Arab community and in state governing bodies.  The papers focus on particular sectors of Israeli public life in which the Arab minority experiences the most exclusion and discrimination and outline specific recommendations for reforming existing laws and policies such that they are equitable and inclusive. Recognizing that gender often presents a barrier to substantive citizenship, special attention is paid by DIRASAT to the development of policies that promote gender equity, as well.

 

 

 

 

[1]  Holston, J., “Urban Citizenship and Globalization,” in Global City-Regions, ed. Allen J. Scott, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

[2]  Jenson, J., Phillips, S. D. 1996. Regime Shifts: New Citizenship Practices in Canada. International Journal of Canadian Studies 14 (Fall): 111-135. Yousef Jabareen, Law, Minority and Transformation: A Critique and Rethinking of Civil Rights Doctrines, 46 Santa Clara L. Rev. 513 (2006).

[3]  Young, I. M..2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[4]  Duffy, K. 1995. Social Exclusion and Human Dignity in Europe. Council of Europe.

[5] David Kretzmer, The Legal Status of Arabs in Israel (1990); Ilan Saban, Minority Rights in Deeply Divided Societies: A Framework for Analysis and the Case of the Arab-Palestinian Minority in Israel, N.Y.U. Journal of Int’l L. & Politics, Vol. 36 (2005).

[6]  For more on collective indigenous rights, see the United Nations Declaration of Indigenous Rights of Indigenous Peoples at: http://www.ohchr.org/english/issues/indigenous/docs/draftdeclaration.pdf





P. O. Box 3190, - Nazareth 16131 - Tel: 972-4-6083333, Fax: 972-4-6083366 - Email: dirasat.aclp@gmail.com